Here is another question about a couple of
events that happened at Robert's trial.
They seperated Christine and Paula Trent during
questioning. They were put into a sound proof
room and was told to stay there while the other
was being questioned. While Paula was on the
stand being questioned, Why did Christine go and
stand with the door opened listening to Paula's
testimony? Wanted to listen so she could keep her
stories straight? Roger, Robert's brother brought
this to the attention of the balif which he went
over and told Christine to close the door and
sit down in the room. When this was brought to
the judges attention. The judge just asked
Christine to come out and she reprimanded her.
Why did the judge not enforce her own rules?
The funny thing is when you read the transcripts,
her statements were almost the same up until the
point to where she got caught listening in the
door. Then her answers changed.
The other thing is, why did it take Christine
over one minute and a half to try to answer
a question? All she started saying was "Your getting
me so confused." Roger was heard saying "Yea your
confused allright. You just got caught lying"
The last thing is, When your talking about a
particular event and time, how can two people
each saying "He had a gun" or "He didn't have a gun"
Make any sense?
Now if someone points a gun at you, are you going
to remember it? I sure as hell would not forget it.
If someone did not point a gun at you at a particular
time. Are you going to remember it? I would think so
because if they did you would remember that.
Now isn't that suspicious that out of two people at a
particular point in time. One said "He had a gun" and the
other one said "He didn't have a gun". Hmmm Sure got
me thinking. Now this story gets even more weired.
They said Robert kept changing guns out and it was like
he didn't know which one he wanted to use. He owned a
44 mag and a 12 ga.shotgun. If a man had a choice, would
it make any difference which one he used? They stated that
Robert said he was going to kill all of them, himself and
the little toy chihuahua dog they had. Now can anyone make
sense as to why a man would kill a little dog with a 44
or a 12 ga. shotgun? Especially the way Robert loves
animals and protects them from hunters or malicious
cruelty? Why would a man have to add to a statement
if he is going to kill someone, "I am going to kill
the little dog too"? That does not make a damn bit of
sense unless you of course are trying to make your
story more dramatic and sensational.
I don't know but I didn't fall off of a turnip truck.
Saturday, October 25, 2014
Thursday, October 23, 2014
Questions about: Christine Ann Trent and Paula Eileen Trent (The Pinocchio Crime Family)
Questions about:
Christine Ann Trent and Paula Eileen Trent
(The Pinocchio Crime Family)
I wonder if Christine remembers testifying in court
about why Sara was not there as a witness? Christine
said it was because of Robert making Sara stand
for long periods of time which developed a sore
on the botton of Sara's foot. Well, we know Robert is
not like that and we also found some of Christine and
Paula's writings about how Sara pulled the meat off the
botton of her foot and created that sore herself.
We all know she had spina bifida and could not feel
her feet which made it very easy for her to ripp the
skin off of it. Anyway, she said Sara was in the
hospital and almost lost her foot and that was
why she could not be there. Why was Sara living
in Michigan at that time? We think we know. Sara
would blow their stories up. She has always had a
problem of telling the truth when put under pressure.
We have another question. After Paula called the police
on Robert, Christine stood over in the next door
neighbors yard. The Police testified in court that
they never once talked to Christine that day and
she just stayed in the neighbors yard.
Here is the question. If someone pulled a
shotgun and or a pistol on you and your kids,
are you not going to want to put it your two cents
about what happened that is if something really did
happen? I mean really. If your a mom and that happens
to your kid, Arn't cha gonna say something? Anything? Hmmm.
We have a whole lot more writings and some new evidence
that will contradict every single thing they have said in
court and to the police. Oh yeah, Why did the DA's
office tell Christine to never call there again?
Oh, Ya mean they figured out she was a liar? How hard
could that a been? Hee hee. Oooops, Here's another one.
Christine stated to the court that she was not pregnant
and could never get pregnant. She never once told the
court that she was fixed by only rubber bands around her
tubes which she has already had trouble with them popping
off. Her tubes were never cut, tied or burned.
The nurse documented Christine saying she had not felt
the baby move in days. Now why would a nurse document that?
Robert remembered when he felt the baby move. Why did
she tell everyone at the church that the baby had just
collapsed? Ya mean baby bones collapse? Geee, didn't know
that. Yeah right. Anyway, How did she get a doctor to
testify about her having pseudocyesis and he never once
psysically examined her? One of Christine's writings.
She wrote down that she was having an affair on Robert
and she thought she was pregnant by this man. Duh, she was
8 1/2 months. She had two positive urine tests and one
positive blood test. Hell, She even looked 8 1/2
months pregnant. Do ya think she was pregnant? Huh,
Who would have noticed that?
Now on the day we had the cadaver dogs come out to
scour the property, Human decomp scent was found in a
garden that was only two years old. The DA's office
said the dogs made a mistake and they would not investigate.
How in the hell do ten dogs make the same damn mistake?
And the police use these exact same dogs? That's enough
for now but we still have a lot more questions that needs
an answer. We are going to wait until we get them into a
courtroom to find out. Oh well, We could not resist this
one. After us slamming their name all over the internet for
around eight years now, How come they will not sue us?
We have repeatedly offered it and they will just not
do it. We know they have seen our offers because we
have seen them on our website and other pages. Hmmm,
I think they know we will nail their butts to the wall!
I guess the bottom line is, how come Christine and
Paula have absolutely no evidence of any kind to prove
a crime was ever committed when they had Robert prosecuted
and convicted but yet we have all this and more to prove
he was lied about and set up? Does anyone see this picture?
Oh yeah, One last thing. Christine said her first husband
tried to poison her with lawn chemicals. But yet he was
never in jail. Now don't you think they would have arrested
him after finding chemicals in Christine's system?
Christine has never said anything about him hitting or
abusing her. It seems if he was dumb enough to poison her
with simple lawn chemicals, he would be dumb enough to
hit her. Now think about this. If Robert was beating
Christine and Paula, don't cha think there would have
been marks? They had nothing. Which comes back to
them bringing guns into the play. Ya see, If they had
no marks of any kind to show the police then Robert
would have got to stay in his home. So they say he used
guns and that way they could have him hauled off to jail
and that left the door open to steal all of his personal
property. Christine stated in court that she did not take
anything but admitted to it in a small claims court. Not
only that but Christine's brother told police that Christine's
new boy friend took all of Robert's property to the flea market
to be sold. Now you ask yourself, were did they get the idea of
bringing guns into it all? Well, We found out that the two
Filipino ladies from accross the street had been talking to them.
They were friends. One of them had her American husband arrested
for threatning her with guns. (Who would have a better
understanding of VAWA than a Filipino?) So from reading Paula's
letter to set Robert up and what happened to the Filipino
lady's husband, It all kind of rings a bell. We are only bringing
out a small part of what we have. The rest is going to be saved
for when we get them to court. I bet we can trip them up good
with this stuff.Remember, you are innocent until proven guilty.
Let me repeat that. You are innocent until proven guilty.
They proved not a damn thing against Robert but yet we have all
this documented and certified evidence that clearly shows what
they did and that is lie their asses off.
Christine Ann Trent and Paula Eileen Trent
(The Pinocchio Crime Family)
I wonder if Christine remembers testifying in court
about why Sara was not there as a witness? Christine
said it was because of Robert making Sara stand
for long periods of time which developed a sore
on the botton of Sara's foot. Well, we know Robert is
not like that and we also found some of Christine and
Paula's writings about how Sara pulled the meat off the
botton of her foot and created that sore herself.
We all know she had spina bifida and could not feel
her feet which made it very easy for her to ripp the
skin off of it. Anyway, she said Sara was in the
hospital and almost lost her foot and that was
why she could not be there. Why was Sara living
in Michigan at that time? We think we know. Sara
would blow their stories up. She has always had a
problem of telling the truth when put under pressure.
We have another question. After Paula called the police
on Robert, Christine stood over in the next door
neighbors yard. The Police testified in court that
they never once talked to Christine that day and
she just stayed in the neighbors yard.
Here is the question. If someone pulled a
shotgun and or a pistol on you and your kids,
are you not going to want to put it your two cents
about what happened that is if something really did
happen? I mean really. If your a mom and that happens
to your kid, Arn't cha gonna say something? Anything? Hmmm.
We have a whole lot more writings and some new evidence
that will contradict every single thing they have said in
court and to the police. Oh yeah, Why did the DA's
office tell Christine to never call there again?
Oh, Ya mean they figured out she was a liar? How hard
could that a been? Hee hee. Oooops, Here's another one.
Christine stated to the court that she was not pregnant
and could never get pregnant. She never once told the
court that she was fixed by only rubber bands around her
tubes which she has already had trouble with them popping
off. Her tubes were never cut, tied or burned.
The nurse documented Christine saying she had not felt
the baby move in days. Now why would a nurse document that?
Robert remembered when he felt the baby move. Why did
she tell everyone at the church that the baby had just
collapsed? Ya mean baby bones collapse? Geee, didn't know
that. Yeah right. Anyway, How did she get a doctor to
testify about her having pseudocyesis and he never once
psysically examined her? One of Christine's writings.
She wrote down that she was having an affair on Robert
and she thought she was pregnant by this man. Duh, she was
8 1/2 months. She had two positive urine tests and one
positive blood test. Hell, She even looked 8 1/2
months pregnant. Do ya think she was pregnant? Huh,
Who would have noticed that?
Now on the day we had the cadaver dogs come out to
scour the property, Human decomp scent was found in a
garden that was only two years old. The DA's office
said the dogs made a mistake and they would not investigate.
How in the hell do ten dogs make the same damn mistake?
And the police use these exact same dogs? That's enough
for now but we still have a lot more questions that needs
an answer. We are going to wait until we get them into a
courtroom to find out. Oh well, We could not resist this
one. After us slamming their name all over the internet for
around eight years now, How come they will not sue us?
We have repeatedly offered it and they will just not
do it. We know they have seen our offers because we
have seen them on our website and other pages. Hmmm,
I think they know we will nail their butts to the wall!
I guess the bottom line is, how come Christine and
Paula have absolutely no evidence of any kind to prove
a crime was ever committed when they had Robert prosecuted
and convicted but yet we have all this and more to prove
he was lied about and set up? Does anyone see this picture?
Oh yeah, One last thing. Christine said her first husband
tried to poison her with lawn chemicals. But yet he was
never in jail. Now don't you think they would have arrested
him after finding chemicals in Christine's system?
Christine has never said anything about him hitting or
abusing her. It seems if he was dumb enough to poison her
with simple lawn chemicals, he would be dumb enough to
hit her. Now think about this. If Robert was beating
Christine and Paula, don't cha think there would have
been marks? They had nothing. Which comes back to
them bringing guns into the play. Ya see, If they had
no marks of any kind to show the police then Robert
would have got to stay in his home. So they say he used
guns and that way they could have him hauled off to jail
and that left the door open to steal all of his personal
property. Christine stated in court that she did not take
anything but admitted to it in a small claims court. Not
only that but Christine's brother told police that Christine's
new boy friend took all of Robert's property to the flea market
to be sold. Now you ask yourself, were did they get the idea of
bringing guns into it all? Well, We found out that the two
Filipino ladies from accross the street had been talking to them.
They were friends. One of them had her American husband arrested
for threatning her with guns. (Who would have a better
understanding of VAWA than a Filipino?) So from reading Paula's
letter to set Robert up and what happened to the Filipino
lady's husband, It all kind of rings a bell. We are only bringing
out a small part of what we have. The rest is going to be saved
for when we get them to court. I bet we can trip them up good
with this stuff.Remember, you are innocent until proven guilty.
Let me repeat that. You are innocent until proven guilty.
They proved not a damn thing against Robert but yet we have all
this documented and certified evidence that clearly shows what
they did and that is lie their asses off.
Sunday, October 19, 2014
Contact information:
Harris County District Attorney
1201 franklin suite 600
Houston, Texas
United States
Phone: 7137555800
hctx.net
Robert McClendon was arrested on September 15, 2005 after his girlfriend, Christine Trent, and her daughter, Paula Trent filed a fraudulent police report stating that he had assaulted them physically and with a weapon. A request for a Protective Order was filed, in which the story changed from what was told on the original police report. In February of 2006, Christine Trent and her mother, Barbara filed a Violation of the Protective Order against Robert. The Violation of the Protective order was dismissed because they were caught lying.
Court was held on in September of 06, in which Christine and Paula Trent changed their stories again in regards to the events that they allege took place on September 15, 2005. The judge, Vanessa Velasquez ruled that no witnesses will be allowed in the court room during other witness testimony. Christine was caught listening at the court room door to her daughter's testimony during the trial and the judge did not invoke her rule and allowed the trial to continue.
After the trial, the police report, Protective Order and trial testimony was analyzed and it was determined that there were over 150 discrepancies in testimony. This was brought to the attention of the Harris Count District Attorney's prosecuting attorneys, Lyn McClellan and Rifian Newaz, who refused to investigate regarding the perjured testimony. Additional evidence, such as recordings and a letter, regarding setting Robert up for an aggravated assault, was also brought to their attention. Again, they refused to investigate. This matter was also brought to the attention of the Harris County District Attorney, Kenneth Magidson by email, certified letters, and even going to the extent of having a letter hand delivered by courier service. Again, Kenneth Magidson refused to even respond.
Small claims suits were brought against Christine for taking possession of weapons from the Precinct 4 Constable's office and also for taking all of Robert's possessions. It was determined that Christine had to pay for the weapons or return them. During the court over Robert's possessions, she claims she did not take the shed belonging to Robert, then, in a national court show, she stated that she was given the shed for her birthday.
How does a woman and her daughter commit aggravated perjury in not one, two or three official proceedings and not get charged with aggravated perjury? How is it that, after all the evidence presented to the Harris County District Attorney's office, that they would refuse to reopen and investigate the case? Why is it that the Harris County District Attorney's office can get one question presented to them, "How many discrepancies in testimony does it take before they would stop a trial and prosecute their own witness for aggravated perjury?", that they can not answer?
You can read the story of Robert McClendon at this site: Americas Wrongfully Convicted and make the determination for yourself. Please sign the petition. The petition can be found on his web page. (Note:) The americaswrongfullyconvicted website has been taken down due to a death in the family but we are working very hard on getting a new one up soon. Thanks for understanding.
Saturday, October 18, 2014
AmericasWrongfullyConvicted sues Christine Ann Trent and wins
Friday, July 25, 2014
Friday, December 11, 2009
The death of common sense in Harris county, Texas DA's office
http://www.americaswrongfullyconvicted.com/harris_county_messages.htm09/15/09: Good morning Harris County DA's office, the citizens of Harris County and Christine and Paula Trent:
Good morning! How about breakfast. "It appears to be pancakes, but it looks like toast, taste like toast." Is it toast or pancakes? How about eggs, "over easy" or "scrambled". Are they over easy or scrambled? It appears to be scrambled, but it could be over easy. If you can't tell, just sit back and stick another donut in your mouth and don't worry about it because things aren't what they appear.
I guess all is wondering what we have been up to, but do you think for a moment that I am going to tell you? Not a chance. How did everyone like the recording from the meeting with the Harris County District Attorney's office? Yeah, we liked it too.
We thought we would help some, so-called educated people out. Let's see, the definition of lying..."a contradictory statement". That's interesting, let's look up "contradictory".. "opposite of". Oh, well, if you look up "inconsistent" in the Thesaurus.. "contradictory". Do you see the pattern here? And, guess what, it took about 5 minutes of "investigating to figure out, when someone says something, then says the opposite, it means they are lying. I'm so impressed with my investigative skills!
Now, for a little more investigating. Review the statements "he had a gun", "he didn't have a gun". Hmmm... I know it "appears" that this could be a difficult analogy, but let's try it. "HAD", "DIDN'T HAVE". Those "appear" to be "opposite". Oh, that means, lying, going back to the break down, which leads right down to... oh.. that's right.. "inconsistent", which falls under the Texas Penal Code, Chapter 37.
Now, that doesn't even take the skill level of a kindergartener to figure out. Hmmm.. Okay boys and girls, "Jane said Dick had a gun." then, "Jane said Dick didn't have a gun." Bet a kindergartener can figure that one out. Now, since the Harris County District Attorney's office hasn't figured that out yet, does that tell you something about the skills of the Harris County District Attorney's office? It tells me something... but of course, we will let you form your own opinion. One thing I will say, is if the safety and welfare is in the hands of people at the Harris County District Attorney's office, I would be scared for the citizens. If they can't figure out someone just lied, how are they going to figure out more complicated cases? Scary!
Have a listen to the recording again from the meeting with the Harris County District Attorney's office on June 12, 2009. The date will tell you, it is with the current administration. I'm scared!
HAVE A NICE DAY! http://www.americaswrongfullyconvicted.com/
Good morning! How about breakfast. "It appears to be pancakes, but it looks like toast, taste like toast." Is it toast or pancakes? How about eggs, "over easy" or "scrambled". Are they over easy or scrambled? It appears to be scrambled, but it could be over easy. If you can't tell, just sit back and stick another donut in your mouth and don't worry about it because things aren't what they appear.
I guess all is wondering what we have been up to, but do you think for a moment that I am going to tell you? Not a chance. How did everyone like the recording from the meeting with the Harris County District Attorney's office? Yeah, we liked it too.
We thought we would help some, so-called educated people out. Let's see, the definition of lying..."a contradictory statement". That's interesting, let's look up "contradictory".. "opposite of". Oh, well, if you look up "inconsistent" in the Thesaurus.. "contradictory". Do you see the pattern here? And, guess what, it took about 5 minutes of "investigating to figure out, when someone says something, then says the opposite, it means they are lying. I'm so impressed with my investigative skills!
Now, for a little more investigating. Review the statements "he had a gun", "he didn't have a gun". Hmmm... I know it "appears" that this could be a difficult analogy, but let's try it. "HAD", "DIDN'T HAVE". Those "appear" to be "opposite". Oh, that means, lying, going back to the break down, which leads right down to... oh.. that's right.. "inconsistent", which falls under the Texas Penal Code, Chapter 37.
Now, that doesn't even take the skill level of a kindergartener to figure out. Hmmm.. Okay boys and girls, "Jane said Dick had a gun." then, "Jane said Dick didn't have a gun." Bet a kindergartener can figure that one out. Now, since the Harris County District Attorney's office hasn't figured that out yet, does that tell you something about the skills of the Harris County District Attorney's office? It tells me something... but of course, we will let you form your own opinion. One thing I will say, is if the safety and welfare is in the hands of people at the Harris County District Attorney's office, I would be scared for the citizens. If they can't figure out someone just lied, how are they going to figure out more complicated cases? Scary!
Have a listen to the recording again from the meeting with the Harris County District Attorney's office on June 12, 2009. The date will tell you, it is with the current administration. I'm scared!
HAVE A NICE DAY! http://www.americaswrongfullyconvicted.com/
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
