Questions of events at Robert's trial

Here is another question about a couple of
events that happened at Robert's trial.
They seperated Christine and Paula Trent during
questioning. They were put into a sound proof
room and was told to stay there while the other
was being questioned. While Paula was on the
stand being questioned, Why did Christine go and
stand with the door opened listening to Paula's
testimony? Wanted to listen so she could keep her
stories straight? Roger, Robert's brother brought
this to the attention of the balif which he went
over and told Christine to close the door and
sit down in the room. When this was brought to
the judges attention. The judge just asked
Christine to come out and she reprimanded her.
Why did the judge not enforce her own rules?
The funny thing is when you read the transcripts,
her statements were almost the same up until the
point to where she got caught listening in the
door. Then her answers changed.
The other thing is, why did it take Christine
over one minute and a half to try to answer
a question? All she started saying was "Your getting
me so confused."  Roger was heard saying "Yea your
confused allright. You just got caught lying"
The last thing is, When your talking about a
particular event and time, how can two people
each saying "He had a gun" or "He didn't have a gun"
Make any sense?
Now if someone points a gun at you, are you going
to remember it? I sure as hell would not forget it.
If someone did not point a gun at you at a particular
time. Are you going to remember it? I would think so
because if they did you would remember that.
Now isn't that suspicious that out of two people at a
particular point in time. One said "He had a gun" and the
other one said "He didn't have a gun". Hmmm  Sure got
me thinking. Now this story gets even more weired.
They said Robert kept changing guns out and it was like
he didn't know which one he wanted to use. He owned a
44 mag and a 12 ga.shotgun. If a man had a choice, would
it make any difference which one he used? They stated that
Robert said he was going to kill all of them, himself and
the little toy chihuahua dog they had. Now can anyone make
sense as to why a man would kill a little dog with a 44
or a 12 ga. shotgun? Especially the way Robert loves
animals and protects them from hunters or malicious
cruelty? Why would a man have to add to a statement
if he is going to kill someone, "I am going to kill
the little dog too"? That does not make a damn bit of
sense unless you of course are trying to make your
story more dramatic and sensational.
I don't know but I didn't fall off of a turnip truck.